All I Want For Christmas...




...is a playoff spot. Okay so maybe I'm better off asking for a pony, but please entertain me for a second if you will.

The Senators are currently sitting 7th (SEVENTH!) in the NHL. They aren't just in the playoffs, they've got a cushion! (please don't mention 35 GP, it's Christmas, just let me go with it)

At 17-14-4 the Senators are 3 games over .500 (I don't understand the math either) and have a favorable schedule on the horizon. With a game in Carolina tonight, then Montreal, Calgary and Buffalo all up after the Christmas break the Sens have a real chance to put themselves in a place no one thought they'd even be close to at the beginning fo the season.

On paper clearly this Senators team doesn't look like they should be a contender. They're somewhat laughable when you stack them up next to a roster like the Bruins, Rangers or Flyers but here's the thing: The east is bad. Perrenial playoff lock Washington appears lost this year. The Sabres are looking for their receipt for Ville Leino. The Tampa Bay Lightning are learning that maybe you can't replicate last seasons's success with a 40+ goalie.

Meanwhile the Senators just seem to have the ingredients right now they've always lacked. They are getting scoring up and down the lineup (11 players in double digit points, 4 in double digit goals), they have a capable puck moving defenseman (who is still making the sophmore mistakes, give it time) and they're winning games they should be but usually don't (taking advantage of a depleted Pens team 6-4 at home and winning a big game in OT against Southeast leaders Florida).

While it might be crazy to think this team which is largely unchanged from the one that started the season (and was anticipated to be only slightly better than Winnipeg) is able to make the playoffs, I'd argue it could very well be where we are headed if the Sens step on the gas coming off the yule season. Granted as I've said before, making the playoffs will more than likely end in being a minor speed bump for an elite east team, I see no reason not to be elated at the chance to watch hockey in spring. Sure the Senators don't have a very realistic chance at hoisting the cup in 2012, but what's wrong with getting the kids a little playoff experience sooner rather than later.

So, who else wants a pony for Christmas?

Playoffs!!!1!...?

So I wake up today and the Sens and Leafs are tied for 8th in the standings. Can anyone help me out here? Are the Senators overachieiving or are the Toronto Maple Leafs failing miserably? (remember when they were first place in the league? Fun times!) For a team picked by most to be the cellar dwellers of the East this season (with the exception of the Winnipeg franchise formerly known as the Atlanta Thrashers) I'm nothing short of surprised with what I've seen out of the Senators so far. While 8th place and a potential first round matchup where the Senators would look like a punching bag to whoever the top team is in the east isn't an enviable position, it should be considered a measure of success given the expectations for this team to start the year.

So of course now that the Senators are barely clinging to relevance in the playoff race a mere 2/5ths of the way into the season it's only logical they start making trades to further position themselves for a first round playoff curbstomping. Enter Kyle Turris.

The aquisition of Kyle Turris brings promise for both the present and future. There seems to be a lot of hype surrounding the potential of this kid despite the fact he's got a very short resume. I'm going to go on record and say I don't know what to expect out of KT, but I hope he can solidify himself in the top half of the lineup. Much like the Filatov experiment I don't see a large amount of downside to this trade. Yes, Rundblad was a big piece to give up (along with a 2nd round pick) but to get a player who's proven he belongs in the NHL (with the potential to excel in the future) you need to give up some assets. It's fairly low risk and potentially high reward. Rundblad was the 3rd best young defenceman in the Senators system and with Cowen and Karlsson looking to be the future on the blueline, his greatest value to the Sens might have been as a piece in this trade rather than as a second line D-man. Finding guys to round out your D beyond the top pairing isn't hard. You grooming your own top guys and use the trade market and free agency to fill the gaps.

Enjoy It While It Lasts

I was thinking the Western Conference would be a nice place to play, what about you?


Another season of Senators hockey is upon us and if you're not excited to see this team return to the ice (only 4 years removed from a Stanley Cup final), well I don't know what to say. That's right, only 4 years ago the Senators were at the top of the Eastern Conference, finally breaking through to the Stanley Cup finals after years of being a top contender in the East. It was a long time coming and there was no reason to believe the on-ice success would end anytime soon. Fast forward 4 seasons: the defensive foundation Senators playoff teams were built on has crumbled, one of the most explosive, top scoring lines in the league is no more and the goaltending is... the same as always I suppose.

Now that I have you here waxing poetic about the halcion days and remembering the good times I'd like to hit you with a fact. The Ottawa Senators are a rebuilding team (if this is news to you, you should probably stop reading now) and would be best served by trading one of, if not both of, Jason Spezza and Daniel Alfredsson. Yes, I just said that.

The Ottawa Senators are clearly in the midst of a rebuild. With a roster full of youth and relatively inexperienced NHL players there is no reason to think this is a Senators team management believes is a legitimate contender. (Note: "management" doesn't include owners who may or may not be dellusional) Every pundit I've read has the Senators at, or near the bottom of the league in their preseason prognostications. If I compare the top 3 players on teams in the East against the top 3 players on the Senators I'm not sure I'd come to a team they could match up against evenly before I reach the 14th team. Given the current state of the Senators I advocate to package up any and all tradable commodities which would bring a decent return in order to prepare for the future. A quick look at the current roster immediately reveals two players who fall into this category and they would surely provide the decent return I speak of.

Jason Spezza is the Ottawa Senators perpetual whipping boy when the going gets tough. Media and fans alike love a good scape goat in Bytown, and what better target than the under performing star center who doesn't play defence and is oft injured? I like Rocco as much as the next guy (I could watch the highlight of him deking Sheldon Souray out of his jock until the cows come home) but let's face it, number 19 is 28 years old and it isn't a stretch to say his best years of hockey might be in the rear view. It's been more than 3 seasons since Spezza had over 73 points and he's missed a minimum of 20 games in the last 2 seasons. His best 3 seasons as a Senator were the first 3 seasons post lockout and he's been on a steady decline ever since. It's time for all the people waiting for him to magically turn a corner (a la Steve Yzerman in Detroit) to wake up and relize that a 28 year old center with a history of back troubles might be on the back end of his career slope.

This isn't to say Spezza's a scrub and not a useful player in today's NHL. A proven playoff performer with 46 points in as many games, and a great play maker when he's feeding someone who can shoot the puck , Spezza would be in demand from teams looking to solidify themselves up the middle. The biggest downside of course is his albatross of a contract. Due 8 million for the next 2 seasons, then 5 and 4 respectively for two years, he's cost prohibitive. A rebuilding team like the Senators however (who shouldn't be looking at legitimate playoff contention for a few years) can afford to take back some shorter term, large contracts other teams might be looking to dump. It's a bitter pill to swallow watching a talented player like Spezza go, but how long can the Senators and their faithful continue to wait for the development of Jason Spezza when everyday might be one more removed from his best?

If you didn't like my idea of trading Giggles, you might want to sit down now or just start penning my death threat. Along with Spezza the other tradable asset the Senators have is Daniel Alfredsson.

You might have heard of a certain blue and whtie team just down the 401. At one point they had themselves a Swedish captain. He was, for a time, very unappreciated mostly during his first few years with this team. Constantly seen as not tough enough, or not a good enough leader. He was often cited as the reason for his team's constant struggles to reach hockey's promised land. Eventually that Swedish captain found his place in the fan's hearts and as the end of his career approached (and the team wasn't in playoff contention) the question started to pop up, should the team trade the captain who gave them so much, so that he can help them prepare for the future?

It may be sad and upsetting to some people, the idea of trading one of their favorite players, but it should be one that is at least entertained. What point is there in having Alfredsson go through the motions for the remaining 2 seasons on his contract if he is more valuable to the team in terms of a trade deadline bargaining chip which playoff bound teams always are willing to overpay for? Would it be nice to see Alfredsson finish out his career as the captain of the team he played his entire career for? Of course! Would it be nice to see him go to a contender for a chance to hoist the cup that will never come for him in Ottawa? Also a pleasant option! (Then of course he'll retire, return to Ottawa in a management capacity and then we can trot him, Birgitta and his brood out to centre ice before a game so we can have one tearful reunion and the Huge Euge can give him something framed)

I'm all for trips down memory lane and remembering the Senators teams of yester-decade, but I don't want to forgo the opportunity to create more memories and success sooner just so I can watch number 11 skate out there on an nightly basis and remind me how it "used to be". When the puck drops on this season and you have a chance to watch the magic Spezza and Alfie might create, enjoy it while it lasts because you never know how much longer you might have that chance.

New World Radio Order



The radio apocalypse is coming... have you picked a side? With the debut of TSN radio this week the Toronto sports radio scene is about to get crowded. For some time now the two combatants, Rogers and Bell, have been massing their armies of on air personalities in anticipation of the upcoming war for the airwaves.


Much like the NHL, which is the bread and butter of sports talk radio north of the 49th; the Canadian sports talk radio scene has primarily remained an old boys network. Recycled hosts, re-tread coaches turned analyst (many who fail to excel in either venture) and veteran newspaper reporters turned radio personalities. Don't get me wrong, some of these people do a bang up job, but other times they just seem like more of the same. People competing for air time who think the louder their voice is, the more valuable their opinion becomes. (We call this the "Around The Horn" theory)


Since TSN announced their foray to the airwaves they've gone in the opposite direction of the Fan, acquiring young up and coming talent with a very small established national footprint. The first shot across the bow of Roger's media was plucking Mike Richards from The Fan 960 in Calgary. For TSN the thinking appears to be the easiest way to hurt your competition is to go after that which they covet most. It was no secret that Richards was targeted by The Fan 590 prior to their on air overhaul late in 2010 but the rumour mill suggested neither side was able to agree upon compensation. Cue TSN with deep pockets and a promise of creative control and Richards was on board.


It appears TSN's strategy to compete with the Fan isn't to do it on the same battlefield. Instead of getting established personalities TSN is going after a younger, more social media savvy roster that seems to be in touch with pop culture.


The afternoon drive slot is shaping up to be an interesting competition. In one corner you have the long established king of afternoon drive time, Bob McCown. Bob's been a staple on the Toronto radio scene for as long as I can remember (he started out as the Blue Jays game day announcer back in their inaugural season) and his no holds barred "my way or the highway", "put that in your pipe and smoke it" attitude has, for the most part, endeared him to the listenership. Bob has shown no willingness to pander to listeners or the local sports team and he calls it exactly as he sees it. (one advertising spot has even trumpeted this virtue of animosity inviting angry listeners to complain at a local sports venue except for the fact it ONLY holds 50,000 people).


With the recent shuffling of the deck at the Fan and presumably with supplementary guest talent being gobbled up by the competition they also decided to give Bob back a former co-host, Damien Cox. So now you have the guy content to continue playing the "get off my lawn" curmudgeon, happy to rest on his laurels of radio success and they've supplemented him with an old boy network, newspaper reporter who loosely uses social media (though he demonstrates a complete lack of understanding how engagement works) and frequently engages in the baiting of readership and will castigate anyone who dares fire a critical thought in his direction.


Meanwhile on the opposite end of the spectrum you have TSN who seem to be embracing the up and comer status and are reaching out to their young, social media savvy target audience. They've tabbed former Sportscentre reporter James Cybulski as the host of their afternoon drive show and paired him up with National Post columnist Bruce Arthur.


Full disclosure, I'm a Bruce Arthur fan boy. He was the first "celebrity" follower I had on twitter. The first person who I already knew existed before I saw him in my followers list. I think his willingness to engage with the reader/listener is what makes him popular and will continue to serve him well in his foray in to radio.


Cybulski has been a reporter with TSN covering such events such as the World Junior Hockey Championships where he's shown a penchant to endear himself to the younger generation. No surprise that he also has a presence on twitter. Bruce built himself a solid reputation with his writing at the Natty Po, frequent guest appearances as a panellist on McCown's own Primetime Sports and with his frequent musings on twitter. Both understands how the new media machine works and will most likely use it to their advantage. TSN understands the tools at their disposal to know what the audience is saying and feeling and they will tap into that, rather than ignore it. Unlike the Fan, and specifically McCown, a man who treats new technology (like wireless devices) as a fad and users of social media are viewed for the most part, as a punch line.


Twice before Bob has taken on competition for the afternoon drive time slot and succeeded. His success in the market might be the reason for his cavalier attitude when it comes to competition. First came The Team Network, with Toronto flagship 1050. Eventually they returned 1050 back to the oldies format and packed up The Team keeping the format in only a few localized markets outside the reach of GTA airwaves. Next up was "Mojo Radio, Talk radio for guys". Again the competition eventually gave in. This time rebranding to AM640, talk radio where the only real sports talk remaining is the Leafs lunch segment as well as Maple Leaf broadcasts. So far Bob's batting 1.000 but his attitude towards his listeners which might finally catch up with him in the new media landscape.


It's no secret in radio, TV or print, the most coveted demographic is male 20 to 30 something’s with high disposable income, and everyone wants their attention. What it appears that Bob, the FAN 590, and Rogers are missing is that this demographic is getting younger. Judging by his stable regular guests and contributors, Bob's core listener is starting to shift out of this age group. People in their 20's and now entering their 30's are more tech savvy. They've come of age in an era where they've always had access to the internet. They aren't buying newspapers and the names of the voices shouting at them on the radio are becoming less and less familiar each day. They're a group who understand they have many alternatives for sports opinion and if they don't like what they hear on the radio their short attention spans can be focused elsewhere with the endless selection provided to them by satellite radio, podcasts and blogs. The strategy of ignoring new media users on PTS could slowly start to backfire.


Without the threat of any real competition, the personalities at the FAN and most notably on PTS have treated airtime as a chance to play catch-up with their circle of sports industry friends. They make inside jokes, the occasional insightful comment and the rest of the time Bob drums up as much animosity as he can with the most contrarian point of view he can think of. (In his defence, Bob usually has a well formed argument) Basically it's the equivalent of being a drive-by asshole. The formula has proven so popular up until now; The FAN saw fit to hire another man in the same ilk as McCown when they brought on Andrew Krystal in the morning. It took less than 6 months for that experiment to fail miserably. Krystal relied on the same formula as Bob, be abrasive, dismissive and rile up the listenership, but he lacked two essential components which have made McCown successful. A solid reputation in the market, and having a defensive standpoint.


With a shuffle of the decks moving Sportsnet's Jim Lang and former AM640 personality Greg Brady (two of the better personnel additions Rogers and The Fan has made recently) we've seen what might be an admission by The Fan that the status quo might not get the job done anymore. They've seen fit to have Krystal back on the radio in the afternoon but he's been noticeably softer and less abrasive than when he started in the mornings.


The Toronto radio apocalypse is coming and it has been for some time. The Fan saw it coming when they shuffled the deck in late 2010 and moved PTS from four, to three, and just this week back to four. On one side you have a network happy to shuffle the deck chairs thinking it will save the ship. An organization which thinks it can reach out to the young demographic by continuing to put a microphone in front of decaying personalities like Don Cherry. On the other side you have a combatant who is fresh thinking that knows the audience isn't necessarily happy with more of the same. A station which will utilize its own stable established talent and complement them with the next generation. For what seems like a long time the Toronto Sports Radio landscape has been shaped by the hosts and not the listeners. Hopefully a new era of competition will serve to improve the product and both outlets can thrive while offering the listener a choice that has been absent for quite some time.


Revealed (!) : Ottawa Senators Top Secret Player Questionnaire




In case you haven't noticed the Senators have been active leading up to the trade deadline.

Mike Fisher... gone.

Chris Kelly... gone.

Under the directive of the Euge, the Senators are finally ready for a rebuild. (and only 3 seasons late!) They're looking to deal anything and everything in an effort to stock the cupboards with picks and prospects.

As part of that process the Senators issued a questionnaire to their players in order to better asses their assets and accommodate outgoing players wishes where possible. We here at Scarlett Ice have obtained a copy of that questionnaire through our top secret sources deep within the Senators organization. (or stolen the idea for this from
Down Goes Brown )

Question 1

Are you Swedish?

( ) yes ( ) no
If yes, you are now finished the questionnaire.

Question 2

Do you remember the 2007 Stanley Cup run?

( ) yes ( ) no
If yes, please start cleaning out your locker.

Question 3

Do you have a no trade clause or a partial no movement clause?

( ) yes ( ) no

If yes, will you waive it if asked to do so?

( ) yes ( ) yes

Question 4

In the event we are able to work out a trade do you have a preference of which NHL city you'd like to play in?

( ) yes ( ) no
If no, even Edmonton?

Question 5

Has your wife submitted to you a list of cities where she is willing to relocate?

( ) yes ( ) no

Question 6

Were you a first overall pick?

( ) yes ( ) no
If yes, when you go home tonight please tell Mrs. Phillips she should start packing and put the house on the market.

Question 7

Are you Russian?

( ) yes ( ) no
If yes, Почему вы думаете, мы платим вам все, что деньги?

Question 8

Did you get a paper cut at any point while taking this questionnaire and have to be placed on the injured reserve?

( ) yes ( ) no
If yes, don't worry Pascal, you have no trade value.

Question 9

In the event you're not moved prior to the deadline and your contract expires in the off season would you be open to returning to the team in a leadership role during a rebuild?

( ) yes ( ) no
If yes, you understand this time it's an actual rebuild and we aren't just changing goalies and coaches again right?

This Is Where I'm Coming From



(warning: the opinion expressed in this post is that of the author (@DHSpeedwagon) and doesn't represent the thinking of Scarlett Ice as a whole. Please feel free to complain about it in the comments)

Late last week in the twitterverse Matt Carle of the Philadelpha Flyers (@mattcarle25) tweeted the following:


"Also, would like to donate some $$$ to a local charity, if I get 10k followers by the end of the reg. season, I'll donate $10k to C.H.O.P."


Now let me start off by saying, in no way do I think donating money to charity is a bad thing. Mr. Carle wants to do something good in his community, and he should be commended for it. I do however, take issue with the fact that Matt uses the guise of giving to charity as means to increase his followers. (I should point out Matt isn't the first player to do this and my opinion isn't focused on him but rather NHL players, and celebrities in general who use this kind of ploy. Matt's just the most recent example. I'm sure he means well, even if he is a Philadelphia Flyer.)

Now again, I'd like to repeat, giving money to charity isn't a bad thing.

According to NHL Numbers ( http://www.nhlnumbers.com/ ) Matt makes $3.5 million this season. That makes his donation approximately 0.29% of his salary. When I mockingly tweeted I would give that much of my salary to charity in exchange for 10,000 followers I was pretty much blasted for being a complainer who is against charity. (It was pointed out that if my donation is about $145 then I might as well just go follow Matt Carle. Silly me, I didn't realize all donations aren't created equally. Oh right, when I follow Matt it's not really my money. I get it now. FULFILLING!)

People love to lambaste me and anyone else who dares share an opinion about Matt and other players like him who've pulled this act before. "What's wrong with you?" "Stop complaining!" "He's trying to do a good thing!" I'm not questioning giving money to charity, I'm just questioning the method in which it's being done.

I use twitter as a tool for interaction. If you have something to say that is:

-entertaining

-funny

-RT'd in my feed


there is a good chance I will follow you. Similarly, I expect that's how I ended up in a lot of my followers feeds. They're most likely following me because of something I tweeted and they enjoy dialogue with me. I don't pander for followers. If people grow tired of what I have to say, or have no interest in me to begin with, they don't need to follow me and I'm not going to ask them to. Furthermore, I don't resort to self serving gimmicks (albeit good intentioned ones) in order to increase my follower count. I don't need to be bullied, guilted, or coerced into following someone and I don't plan on doing the same. I expect the content of my feed, and the feed of others to drive the counts.

What would be wrong with Matt Carle tweeting he donated $10,000 to charity and telling everyone about it after the fact? Why do I have to commit to listening to his rambling about Superbowl bets or what he's watching on television in order to feel better about myself and ensure he gives money to charity? If Matt doesn't get his 10,000 followers should I feel guilty about the sick kids who won't get their money because I didn't follow him? Why should the onus be put on me and others when Matt can easily just give the money? If Matt doesn't get 10,000 followers and donate to charity it isn't my fault for not following, it's his for coming up with the dumb idea in the first place.


One of the biggest rebuttals from people is "he'll probably give the money anyway". If that's the case then why the big charade? You're admitting that more than likely the whole thing is a rouse so that Matt can pad his follower count and you, him and the sick kids can all feel better. Obviously Matt isn't going to renege (I hope) if he doesn't get the 10,000 followers (unless he has really bad PR advisers) and he will more than likely donate the money to charity regardless.


It seems disingenuous to me to wrap up a gift to charity (which is good!) with a gimmick to increase your following. In the end I'd rather Matt makes his good gesture and tweets something that makes me want to follow him rather than pandering to the masses with a sense of guilt or obligation making them feel like they have to.

This Is Why You Suck: My Open Letter To Dany Heatley




I still remember that Tuesday afternoon in late august when word broke late in the day the Ottawa Senators traded for you. I had just left my office and was going to Guelph for the evening and spent the entire ride listening to the trade being broken down on my radio. It was earlier that afternoon when Ottawa made news with the re-signing of "star player" Marian Hossa only to turn around and trade him to Atlanta in exchange for you.

That moment symbolized a turning point in Senators franchise history. It was the transition from an organization that slowly built through the draft and prospect development to one that was on the verge of something big. An organization that was no longer willing to wait. An organization, that for the first time in their history had a superstar player.

Remember, at the time of the trade Spezza was still an unproven asset coming out of the lockout, particularily after being returned to junior twice in his young career. Chara, beyond his size, was still a relative unknown on the blueline throughout much of the league and Alfredsson had yet to exceed 80 points in a single season.

You demonstrated on various occasions, prior to joinning the Sens, that you had the tools to be a superstar in the league. In your rookie campaign with the Thrashers you won the Calder trophy with 67 points and showed a nack for goal scoring, netting 26. You built on that with 89 pts (41 of those goals) in a 77 game sophmore season which also included a trip to the allstar game where you found the net 4 more times and managed to take MVP honours. Injuries derailed your third season, yet you still managed 25 points in 31 games, that isn't even mentioning the untold emotional damage you dealt with on top of the physical. On the international stage you had success for Canada netting 20 goals and 32 points in 34 games for Canada at World Championships from 2002 to 2005. When the Ottawa Senators made the trade for you they were aquiring a player with a pedigree, the likes of which they never had prevoiusly.

Once you arrived in Ottawa things were even better than imagined. Alongside Spezza and Alfrdesson almost immediately you became one of the most potent offensive lines in the NHL, and possibly in Senators history. All three of you went on to score better than a point a game for those first 3 seasons together. Not only did you live up to the billing but you transformed the team around you. The Senators went from a trap oriented, defence first team under Jacques Martin to a team that could not only play better than average defence but also stymie opponents on offence. Everything finally clicked for Senators and in only the second season after the trade Ottawa (perenial playoff busts up to that point) went to the Stanley Cup final. Sadly the story there didn't have the ending we would have hoped for but so much promise was built in those first 2 seasons, future success seemed as if it was just around the corner.

With you in the fold Ottawa finally had "their guy". For me, I was on your side from the start. I got a Heatley sweater, a Heatley Shirtsey, my internet moniker was even inspired by you. (as well as my partiality to power ballad bands from Champaign, Illinois and my affinity for pushing the boundries of good taste) You were the Senators player I always wanted . The undisputed star I could point to on my team and say "Him! That's the guy who gets it done! That's the guy who puts the points on the board. That's the guy you wish you had." I had never had that before and with you on the Senators I felt a sense of real NHL legitimacy surrounded my team, for the first time.

Prior to the beginning of that 3rd season (your last under contract) when you signed your 6 year extension, I thought that was it. That was the deal. That was 7 more quality years of following my team, of offensive displays, of Rocket Richard campaigns and Stanley Cup runs. Seven years where I wouldn't have to worry. You were commited to the Senators and I was commited to you. I poured my heart into my team and now Dany Heatley was standing up and declaring he wanted to be part of that team, long term.

All the promise built up in the Stanley Cup run looked like it was in paying off. Ottawa got off to a scorching start in the fall of 2007, but then things all came crashing down. After only 4 losses in the first 20 games the Sens fell apart in the remainder of the season. They fired John Paddock and limped into the playoffs, only to be swept by the Pittsburgh Penguins. In 2008 things went from bad to worse. Another fired coach, this time Craig Hartsburg who made it to the 48 game mark, was replaced with Cory Clouston. The final nail in the coffin was missing the playoffs, Ottawa's first time in 11 seasons when they wouldn't play beyond game number 82.

Finally when it looked like things had gotten as low as they could, the final blow was dealt. You demanded a trade. Citing a need for a fresh start and unhappiness with a reduced role, the man who just finished year 1 of a 6 year commitment decided he had enough? You enjoyed the highs but had no interest in experiencing any lows. Instead of giving a second chance to the team that gave you yours, your only interests were the interests of Dany Heatley. Your thoughts were of Stanley Cups with contenders and signing bonuses, not rebuilding the team you had just lead on the ice for 4 years. Instead of accepting the challenge of improving your game in Ottawa and helping the team regain the form they showed only 18 months prior in the Stanley Cup final, you represented the worst thing I can think of as a sports fan, a bandwagoner. Only interested in the good times and when they came to an all to sudden stop, instead of taking the hard road or accepting responsibility you, Dany Heatley, jumped ship.

This is why you suck, and this is why I'll be sitting in front of my television yelling obsenities and cursing your very existence on that ice while I hope the fans of Ottawa deliver a rain of boos I think you so truly deserve.






XML

Powered by Blogger



  • © 2006 Scarlett Ice | Blogger Templates by GeckoandFly.
    No part of the content or the blog may be reproduced without prior written permission.